Research
Every paper slots into a defined research pillar so the site compounds authority instead of drifting across unrelated topics. The writing is designed for both newer developers and senior engineers who need the threat context fast.
Research papers are now driven from the shared publication source so the catalog and content stay aligned.
Build tooling, CI runners, signing flows, and release automation all become trust-bearing systems once a team ships software at speed.
AI does not invent a new trust problem here. It lowers the cost of believable output, which makes workflow trust harder to defend.
Every paper and eBook must slot into one pillar. That keeps today’s publishing work aligned with the service verticals Banjico will eventually sell.
Supply-chain hardening consulting
Dependency poisoning, typosquatting, malicious packages, build compromise, and update-path abuse.
Use this pillar →AI integration security
AI-assisted phishing, prompt injection, deepfake social engineering, and adversarial workflow abuse.
Use this pillar →Secure web systems and custom software
Secure defaults, auth patterns, hardening, deployment hygiene, and application threat modeling.
Use this pillar →Identity and pipeline security
Token theft, OAuth misuse, secrets exposure, pipeline poisoning, and build-system trust boundaries.
Use this pillar →Developer security training and audits
Extension attacks, IDE compromise, social engineering, and the habits that make builders easier to target.
Use this pillar →Security architecture consulting
Zero-trust patterns, segmentation, incident readiness, and infrastructure review for small teams.
Use this pillar →Each paper follows the same editorial shape so the library stays readable and useful at scale.
Public research should read like it was written by someone who has done the work and cited the work.
Primary sources, vendor advisories, CVE records, OWASP, MITRE ATT&CK, and NIST before opinion.
Every paper ends with practical implications, not just diagnosis.
Newer developers can follow the context; senior engineers still get technical value.
The copy should be restrained, specific, and free of sales language.
If a paper maps directly to your problem, use the discovery flow and scope the work from there.
